From: Piergiuliano Bossi <p_bossi_AGAINST_SPAM@...>
Date: 2005-09-23T00:21:39+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] Dissident 0.1, a Ruby dependency injection container

Christian Neukirchen wrote:
> Piergiuliano Bossi <p_bossi_AGAINST_SPAM@tiscali.it> writes:
> 
> 
>>Piergiuliano Bossi wrote:
>>
>>>Logan Capaldo wrote:
>>>
>>>The whole point is about lower coupling, higher cohesion, enhance
>>>independence, ease testing in isolation.
>>
>>Ehm, to be precise I'm not advocating the use of an IoC container; on
>>the other side, the principle of dependency injection is an important
>>tool to put in your box.
> 
> 
> Just curious, but you could explain why you do not advocate using IoC
> containers?

Jacob explained it perfectly. FWIW, I like Jim Weirich position too.
The exact need for an IoC container/framework would be less 
important/frequent if you use a flexible language like ruby and/or you 
develop with dependency injection in mind.

Ciao
Giuliano

-- 
If you want to send me an email address should be 'p', then a dot, 
followed by 'bossi' at 'quinary', another dot and 'com' at last