From: Michel Martens <blaumag@...>
Date: 2005-09-20T23:46:44+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby idiom for python's for/else while/else

On 9/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I think that's the closest your going to get to python's
> while/else.  You have the use the opposite polarity for the for
> loop as why demonstrated.  One of my RCR's is about this
> inconsistency.  I think all of the loop methods should return
> nil by default (with break(ret) causing it to return something
> else).

Agree.


Michel.