From: Jeff Wood <jeff.darklight@...>
Date: 2005-09-01T23:10:16+09:00
Subject: Re: nano & mega

--------------050908020109060808000605
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dave Burt wrote:

>Jeff Wood wrote:
>  
>
>>Wow, I'd say that the punctionation ( with conversion or not ) should
>>come out of the filenames... the %3A stuff is about as un-user-friendly
>>as anything I've ever seen.
>>    
>>
>
>You'd have to have a better alternative, and I can't think of one. 
>Consistent naming's important, and I'd rather not be using interesting 
>suffixes like "nano/array/rotate_bang".
>
>To ease the pain, instead of:
>  require 'nano/array/rotate%21'
>nano provides:
>  require 'nanoreq'  # or nanosys or nano or nano/base
>  require_nano 'array/rotate!'
>and I presume mega has an analog.
>
>Cheers,
>Dave 
>
>
>
>
>  
>
well, there are many alternatives.. I'd just have require 'nano/array'  
or if you still want the one-by-one functionality ... require 
'nano/array/rotate' 

ymmv.

j.



--------------050908020109060808000605--