From: Patrick Gundlach <clr7.10.randomuser@...>
Date: 2005-08-20T02:06:16+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby Specifications

Hi


>>I posted into the past that i really don't like it that matz break
>> compatibility in minor release changes. Suddenly returning a "[]"
>> instead of "nil" might be a small change but it can cost millions of
>> dollars if it happens in a critical environment.

Isn't that where (unit) testing comes into play? So that errors like
this will be detected before upgrading? Thats at least how I handle it.

Patrick