From: Julian Leviston <julian@...>
Date: 2005-08-12T11:24:31+09:00
Subject: Re: 10.2.8 and rubygems

Yup, that's right. I did say 1.8.2. (<quizzical look>).

I'm just choosing to wait 3 weeks until our server is upgraded to  
10.3 or 10.4.2 or something then I can be pretty sure 1.8.2 will  
work. I don't even know if 1.8.2 is MEANT to work on 10.2.8. Hmmm. It  
might have some bizarre dependency which I don't have installed. But  
the thing is, it doesn't appear to, and it (Rb) seems to install and  
test out just fine when I make it. :-S

It's VERY frustrating... especially when I'd like to start deploying  
my simple apps to see how viable Rails is in a real environment.

J

ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [powerpc-darwin8.0]


On 12/08/2005, at 4:23 AM, Chad Fowler wrote:
>>> What's your ruby -v?
>>>
>
> (you said "1.8.2")
>
> This is something the ruby-core people might like to try to get more
> details on.  It's obviously some kind of bug in the ruby interpreter
> or one of the included extensions (no pure ruby library should cause
> the interpreter to crash with an "Illegal instruction" message).
>
> What's the full output of ruby -v?  That might be relevant.
>
> -- 
> Chad Fowler
> http://chadfowler.com
> http://rubycentral.org
> http://rubygarden.org
> http://rubygems.rubyforge.org (over 700,000 gems served!)
>
>