From: gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...>
Date: 2005-08-12T02:06:10+09:00
Subject: Re: Yet Another useless Ruby 2 Idea

mathew ha scritto:

> 
> 
> No--the second definition of bar is only in scope within foo, so when 
> bar is called, the only visible definition is the first one, which 
> prints "ONE". Then foo is called, which prints "TWO".  I tested my 
> examples before posting :-)

actually, not, #bar just gets redefined overriding the former definition.

There are no nested method in ruby (yet):

irb(main):001:0>  def bar
irb(main):002:1>     puts "ONE"
irb(main):003:1>  end
=> nil
irb(main):004:0>
irb(main):005:0*  def foo
irb(main):006:1>     puts "TWO"
irb(main):007:1>
irb(main):008:1*     def bar
irb(main):009:2>       puts "THREE"
irb(main):010:2>     end
irb(main):011:1>  end
=> nil
irb(main):012:0>
irb(main):013:0*  bar
ONE
=> nil
irb(main):014:0>  foo
TWO
=> nil
irb(main):015:0>  bar
THREE
=> nil