From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2005-08-12T01:49:15+09:00
Subject: Re: Yet Another useless Ruby 2 Idea

>>>>> "m" == mathew  <meta@pobox.com> writes:

m> No--the second definition of bar is only in scope within foo, so when 
m> bar is called, the only visible definition is the first one, which 
m> prints "ONE". Then foo is called, which prints "TWO".  I tested my 
m> examples before posting :-)

 Change the order to

   foo
   bar

 and look the result



Guy Decoux