From: Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
Date: 2005-08-11T04:43:35+09:00
Subject: Re: new block notation

--- James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:

> On Aug 10, 2005, at 2:09 PM, Eric Mahurin wrote:
> 
> > I'd rather keep the {}
> > for blocks/lambdas.  But, I don't think we should move the
> > ambiguity from blocks vs. hashes (overloading {}) to arrays
> vs.
> > hashes (overloading []).  It would be better for hashes to
> just
> > have their own unambiguous syntax.
> 
> We have the current Array[...]/Hash[...] option, which has
> been  
> growing on me lately.

Yep.  If you used those two, you really wouldn't even need the
[] construct - the [] operator would do.



		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs