From: James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Date: 2005-08-11T04:34:17+09:00
Subject: Re: new block notation

On Aug 10, 2005, at 2:09 PM, Eric Mahurin wrote:

> I'd rather keep the {}
> for blocks/lambdas.  But, I don't think we should move the
> ambiguity from blocks vs. hashes (overloading {}) to arrays vs.
> hashes (overloading []).  It would be better for hashes to just
> have their own unambiguous syntax.

We have the current Array[...]/Hash[...] option, which has been  
growing on me lately.

James Edward Gray II