From: baalbek <rcs@...>
Date: 2005-08-09T06:51:09+09:00
Subject: Re: FXRuby or wxRuby?

Curt Hibbs wrote:
> baalbek wrote:
> 
>> I know wxWindows for C++ rather well, and have started to use wxRuby.
>>
>> But after learning about FXRuby, it is apparent to me that there is 
>> more activity going on with FXRuby (now at version 1.2.x. wxRuby seems 
>> parked at version 0.6, last updated at nov-2002).
> 
> 
> Actually, there is a *lot* of wxRuby activity going on. But you wouldn't 
> know it if you're not subscribed to the wxRuby mailing list. The 0.6 
> version that you see has been totally rewritten using SWIG resulting in 
> a must more robust wrapping of wxWidgets.

I'm glad to hear this!

I like wxRuby, and in spite the somewhat lacking documentation for 
wxRuby, one can get by with the docs for wxWindows, which are quite good.

Baalbek