From: gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...>
Date: 2005-08-07T17:36:07+09:00
Subject: Re: new block notation (was: Re: ruby-dev summary 26468-26661)

Mike Austin ha scritto:


> 
> If def returned the actual function, the 'anonymous' functionality would
> fit right in.  Refactoring, we have:

<snip>
yes, but I was thinking on the lines of "mh.. def withouth a name does 
not define anything.. maybe we can define something which explicitly 
does not have a name..". But as I said I'm on the fun side.