From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Date: 2005-08-05T01:03:38+09:00
Subject: Re: a restricted send (was: Re: ruby-dev summary 26468-26661)

"David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:

> Hi --
>
> Another possibility would be perhaps a "secret" (or something) level
> of protection:
>
>    def x
>    end
>
>    secret :x
>
> which would mean not even to be acknowledged as existing when
> requested from outside by "send".

It's likely you forget a method then, though.

IMO, all methods to be called on possibly "dangerous" ways should be
explictly declared.  It's just too easy to create security holes.

> David A. Black
-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org