From: tirkal <tirkal@...>
Date: 2005-08-05T00:52:32+09:00
Subject: Re: Possible bug, or just confusing documentation of class Icon in the Ruby standard library.

------=_Part_5693_22331330.1123170724767
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Just a clarification for my previous email:
 "The Iconv class (inside the stdlib iconv package, rdoc:
http://www.ruby-doc.org/stdlib/libdoc/iconv/rdoc/classes/Iconv.html)
docs lead one to believe that Iconv.conv is equivalent *to Iconv.iconv and=
=20
Iconv#iconv*. As I'm going
to demonstrate, this is not the case. Furthermore, the behavior of
both Iconv.iconv and Iconv#iconv seems to be strange, surprising, and
quite possibly also buggy."
 Tirkal

------=_Part_5693_22331330.1123170724767--