From: Julian Leviston <julian@...>
Date: 2005-08-03T21:41:26+09:00
Subject: Re: setting up ruby on os x 10.2

I haven't installed rails yet.

I'm still trying to install gem...

I did which ruby and it said /usr/bin now I've deleted that (1.6.7)  
it now says /usr/local/bin (1.8.2)

So I'm using the correct Ruby... but maybe something else wrong?

Julian.

On 03/08/2005, at 10:38 PM, Ralf M�ller wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 20:13:55 +0900
> Julian Leviston <julian@coretech.net.au> wrote:
>
>
>> I'm not sure how this works, but my path WAS and IS this:
>>
>> /sw/bin /sw/sbin /usr/local/bin /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin /usr/
>> X11R6/bin
>>
>> Which is a bit interesting, because typing ruby -v would echo 1.6.7
>> which was kinda weird... because I had 1.8.2 installed. After
>> deleting / hardlilnking / symlinking, of course it does 1.8.2... but
>> I *STILL* can't get gem installed.
>>
>> Any further ideas?
>>
>>
>
> I'm still not sure, if gem has install rails or not. The Non- 
> existence of
> /usr/local/bin/rails is just ONE circumstantial evidence. Try to  
> find something
> like /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-x.y.z . This would  
> indicate, that
> gem ha successfully downloaded and extraced the rails-gem.
>
> I bet ruby (1.6.7) lays under /sw/bin and the first path wins.
> /usr/local/bin/ruby isn't recognized.
>
> try
> which ruby
>
> or
> type -p ruby
>
> to see, which ruby the shell is takeing.
>
> and do a
> find -name rails
>
> under /usr/local.
>
> and do a
> find -name rails
>
> under /usr/local. You may have done that already. I don't know.
>
> best regards
> ralf
>
>