From: Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>
Date: 2005-07-31T05:14:16+09:00
Subject: Re: Refactoring Tycho API - Opinions wanted

Kero wrote:
>>>Actually, let me stop right here and say that Tycho is not intended
>>>for to-do or appointment types of things.
>>
>>I fear I will have to move forward without Tycho.
>>Discussion in this thread has been very useful, thanks.
> 
> 
> otoh, trying to get a generic storage is fun,
> and ruby allows you to actually use it with so few code.
> 
>     http://chmeee.dyndns.org:8880/    while it is running,
>        which is probably the entire weekend (but no longer).
> 
> Utterly primitive view (who cares) on *some* of the data.
> Note that you can not access :8881 which runs a local view on *all* the
> data :)

I've looked at this, but I'm not entirely sure of the
significance of what I see. ;)  Is it that you've put
together a directory-oriented form of storage? In very
little code, I would guess?

FYI, I'm also working on a private project which would
be a to-do list tailored for my own use. I do plan,
however, to make it customizable so that people could
turn off the freaky features that only I would want.

Currently it's a web app, but if I rewrite it carefully,
even more of the "guts" can be re-used, e.g., in a
desktop GUI app.

If you're interested in that, we can talk offlist. We
might be able to share some code. I've made significant
progress toward handling repeating events and such.


Hal