From: gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...>
Date: 2005-07-29T11:21:01+09:00
Subject: Re: Next Official Ruby Version

Martin DeMello ha scritto:
> Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@scriptolutions.com> wrote:
> 
>>Well, tell me where are the alternatives ?
>>
>>Show me some for a higher level language that does not have the
>>gotchas of C++, will work for large projects (SmartEiffel does not
>>do this well), compiles to native executable, is statically typed,
>>has a garbage collector and is available on MacOSX,Linux,Win32 ?
> 
> 
> Erlang and OCaml come to mind (not saying they're as suitable as D for a
> C++ replacement, but they meet all the criteria above).

is'nt erlang dynamically tiped
(with external optional type inferencers) ?