From: Lothar Scholz Date: 2005-07-29T05:33:05+09:00 Subject: Re: Next Official Ruby Version Hello Martin, MD> Lothar Scholz wrote: >> Well, tell me where are the alternatives ? >> >> Show me some for a higher level language that does not have the >> gotchas of C++, will work for large projects (SmartEiffel does not >> do this well), compiles to native executable, is statically typed, >> has a garbage collector and is available on MacOSX,Linux,Win32 ? MD> Erlang and OCaml come to mind (not saying they're as suitable as D for a MD> C++ replacement, but they meet all the criteria above). I forgot OO on my criteria list, so Erlang is also off the list. Oberon2 and Modula3 meet this goals but i find both are too simple. -- Best regards, emailto: scholz at scriptolutions dot com Lothar Scholz http://www.ruby-ide.com CTO Scriptolutions Ruby, PHP, Python IDE 's