From: "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...>
Date: 2005-07-29T05:31:01+09:00
Subject: [OT] Re: Next Official Ruby Version

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Martin DeMello wrote:

> Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@scriptolutions.com> wrote:
>> Well, tell me where are the alternatives ?
>>
>> Show me some for a higher level language that does not have the
>> gotchas of C++, will work for large projects (SmartEiffel does not
>> do this well), compiles to native executable, is statically typed,
>> has a garbage collector and is available on MacOSX,Linux,Win32 ?
>
> Erlang and OCaml come to mind (not saying they're as suitable as D for a
> C++ replacement, but they meet all the criteria above).

have you used D martin?

-a
-- 
===============================================================================
| email :: ara [dot] t [dot] howard [at] noaa [dot] gov
| phone :: 303.497.6469
| My religion is very simple.  My religion is kindness.
| --Tenzin Gyatso
===============================================================================