From: Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>
Date: 2005-07-29T04:51:03+09:00
Subject: Re: Next Official Ruby Version

Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@scriptolutions.com> wrote:
> Well, tell me where are the alternatives ?
> 
> Show me some for a higher level language that does not have the
> gotchas of C++, will work for large projects (SmartEiffel does not
> do this well), compiles to native executable, is statically typed,
> has a garbage collector and is available on MacOSX,Linux,Win32 ?

Erlang and OCaml come to mind (not saying they're as suitable as D for a
C++ replacement, but they meet all the criteria above).

martin