From: Charles Steinman <acharlieblue@...>
Date: 2005-07-27T03:31:10+09:00
Subject: Re: Abstract class or interface?


redentis wrote:
> From what you're saying, the answer in Ruby is to examine the code
> and/or the documentation, which is reasonable enough, but, it does seem
> to make it much more difficult to extend frameworks written in Ruby.
> Particularly since you wouldn't know whether you'd missed a method
> until you attempted to run some code.

This sounds like a good use for unit tests, if you ask me.