From: Jacob Fugal <lukfugl@...>
Date: 2005-07-27T00:18:28+09:00
Subject: Re: defining to_s works oddly?

On 7/26/05, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
> For that, you need the duck typed version of the method, to_str()...

I'm curious about that... why the two methods, to_s/to_str? I know
it's been discussed before, and I *think* I understood it then, but
I've since forgotten and there are probably others who haven't heard
the explanation before.

Jacob Fugal