From: Devin Mullins <twifkak@...>
Date: 2005-07-17T06:27:14+09:00
Subject: Re: `not' in parameter lists

Daniel Brockman wrote:

>I realize that ‘not foo not bar and not baz’ would be confusing.
>But I maintain that there is only one way to parse ‘assert not foo?’,
>and that it looks better than ‘assert !foo?’.
>  
>
Well, I agree with you. There's only one way to parse `assert puts foo` 
that I know of, too. Also, I like the ability to do a LISP-with-commas 
syntax, though Ruby disallows it sometimes. But whatever.

Devin