From: Robert Oliver <rwoliver2@...>
Date: 2005-07-17T02:25:24+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby VS PHP

------=_Part_283_30611254.1121534650632
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 7/16/05, "Eust=E1quio Rangel de Oliveira Jr." <eustaquiorangel@yahoo.com=
>=20
wrote:
>=20
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> | The main PHP problem is just that too many people thought (and even
> | still think) it scales well with increased application size.
>=20
>=20
>=20
I still think that PHP 4/5 have uses, especially in small sites or in=20
one-post type applications. Even though Ruby / Rails seem the most efficien=
t=20
languages to me even for middle sized projects, PHP has the ability to=20
quickly let you implement a template system, or to do a quick form that in=
=20
Ruby dragging out CGI would seem too much.=20

So, from my personal perspective, and what direction our company is taking,=
=20
Ruby (and/or) Rails for medium and large projects, and PHP for small ones.


--=20

Robert W. Oliver II
CEO / President - OCS Solutions, Inc.
http://www.ocssolutions.com/

------=_Part_283_30611254.1121534650632--