From: Gavin Kistner <gavin@...>
Date: 2005-07-13T10:28:36+09:00
Subject: Re: Splitting source code

On Jul 12, 2005, at 10:15 AM, Daniel Brockman wrote:
>> It feels sketchy-but-acceptable to me to have FileB require FileA to
>> be meaningful, as long as FileA can stand on its own.
>>
>
> Isn't this a typical and completely normal dependency?

Damn, I was afraid someone might notice that :)

Yes, it is. Yet I can't figure out what the difference is between my  
Bar class requiring Foo from another file to make sense, versus my  
Bar class requiring other pieces of Bar defined in another file.  
Something smells slightly off (and yet it's what I was describing  
that I did previously). *shrug*