From: Daniel Brockman Date: 2005-07-02T11:10:09+09:00 Subject: Re: no clue Daniel Brockman writes: >> Also, this will get ran potentially thousands of times per second, >> so executation speed is of some concern. > > I don't know if the above is the best you can do, but I do believe > it is a bit faster than your original version. According to my tests, it is also more than twice as fast as that enourmous strscan implementation. (Can anyone confirm?) -- Daniel Brockman