From: Neville Burnell Date: 2005-06-08T16:20:33+09:00 Subject: Re: new article And finally, I'd like to see more detail about Mock fixtures ... I'm a Mock newbie and it would be nice to include the DATA and the test run details showing a full mock test example. -----Original Message----- From: Neville Burnell [mailto:Neville.Burnell@bmsoft.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, 8 June 2005 5:06 PM To: ruby-talk ML Subject: Re: new article On pg 18 of the PDF now which talks about unit_diff, and I'm unclear about the before & after results ... May I suggest clearly labelling this section for example: Standard test run: ... With unit_diff: ... -----Original Message----- From: Neville Burnell [mailto:Neville.Burnell@bmsoft.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, 8 June 2005 4:36 PM To: ruby-talk ML Subject: Re: new article Hi, I'm just reading the PDF and on pg 13 you flesh out the echo() method, but the def doesn't include any parameters, in particular it should [I think] be: Def echo(url) So the echo method as documented should fail, correct ? Nev -----Original Message----- From: pat eyler [mailto:pat.eyler@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2005 4:04 AM To: ruby-talk ML Subject: new article Sorry for posting about my own article, but I'm interested in feedback, recommendations for future topics, etc. IBM has just published an article I wrote about doing test first development with Ruby: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/edu/os-dw-os-ruby1-i.html (sorry, you need to sign in (free account) to read it). I've got an opportunity to do some more writing for them (how much more depends on how well received/popular the articles are), and I'd love to get some feedback from the community about what kinds of Ruby things I should be sending their way. -- thanks, -pate ------------------------- We are often unable to tell people what they need to know, because they want to know something else, and would therefore only misunderstand what we said - the Raven (George MacDonald, Lilith)