From: Austin Ziegler Date: 2005-06-05T08:15:15+09:00 Subject: Re: Package, a future replacement for setup.rb and mkmf.rb On 6/4/05, Christian Neukirchen wrote: > But now, I'll ask you: Are you satisfied with the way installing Ruby > extensions and libraries works? Do you think there is a place for > Package? Do you have further improvements or can provide alternative > ideas? I think that there is room for improvement, definitely. However, if you're going to do extension support with this, it absolutely *must* work perfectly well on Windows. It has to work better than setup.rb, and setup.rb works mostly well for that. Gems, much less so. -austin -- Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca