From: ES <ruby-ml@...>
Date: 2005-06-02T09:14:08+09:00
Subject: Re: Method Chaining Issues


Le 2/6/2005, "Nikolai Weibull"
<mailing-lists.ruby-talk@rawuncut.elitemail.org> a �crit:
>ES wrote:
>
>> class Foo
>>   def initialize
>>     @a = 5
>>   end
>>
>>   attr_accessor :a
>> end
>>
>> foo = Foo.new
>> foo.a = 6
>>
>> Current behaviour aside, should the last line create a new Foo object?
>
>Very funny.  Totally different argument,

This is the counterargument for keeping destructive methods.

>        nikolai

E

--
template<typename duck>
void quack(duck& d) { d.quack(); }