From: itsme213 <itsme213@...>
Date: 2005-05-30T23:55:23+09:00
Subject: Re: creating variable with eval


"Stefan Kaes" <skaes@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:429B17D3.5040308@gmx.net...
> Robert Klemme wrote:
>
> >This comes up again and again.  You might want to search the archives.
> >
> >
> This comes up again and again because the current behaviour is
> inconsistent with the proudly stated principle of least suprise. As I
> have said before: eval "code" should be equivalent to code in all
contexts.

No need for the touchy "POLS" reference, but ...

It would be a good change if eval'd code was equivalent to non-eval'd code.