From: Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
Date: 2005-05-19T06:05:33+09:00
Subject: Re: syntax sugar: treating an object like a method

On 5/18/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > I'm thinking of yet another RCR and would like to see if
> > > anybody likes it.  I think this would be a sweet feature.
> > Here
> > > are the basic components:
> >
> > Please don't. This would be awful. Ruby doesn't need a ()
> > operator.
> I already knew your answer.

Maybe that suggests that you're proposing really bad ideas, or at
least proposing them badly. You convinced me on the prior RCR. This
one is a bad idea from the top.

-austin
-- 
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
               * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca