From: Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
Date: 2005-05-19T04:48:44+09:00
Subject: Re: syntax sugar: treating an object like a method

> > I'm thinking of yet another RCR and would like to see if
> > anybody likes it.  I think this would be a sweet feature. 
> Here
> > are the basic components:
> 
> Please don't. This would be awful. Ruby doesn't need a ()
> operator.

I already knew your answer.



		
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html