From: Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
Date: 2005-05-19T03:30:56+09:00
Subject: Re: syntax sugar: treating an object like a method

On 5/18/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm thinking of yet another RCR and would like to see if
> anybody likes it.  I think this would be a sweet feature.  Here
> are the basic components:

Please don't. This would be awful. Ruby doesn't need a () operator.

-austin
-- 
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
               * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca