From: Pit Capitain <pit@...>
Date: 2005-05-18T05:12:18+09:00
Subject: Re: Help regarding def wrapper

Nikolai Weibull schrieb:
> Gavin Kistner wrote:
> 
>>What do you prefer about the above, versus the existing (and, IMO,  
>>slightly prettier):
>>
>>class A
>>    private; def meth1( arg1, arg2=:foo )
>>        'private'
>>    end
>>end
> 
> Well, the visibility will affect all methods defined after it and I
> really want to intermingle methods of varying visibility, i.e., not, as
> you suggest below, to group them by visibility.

But you *can* use Gavin's syntax, if you "decorate" *every* method with 
its visibility. The sequence doesn't matter at all in this case.

Regards,
Pit