From: gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...>
Date: 2005-05-16T05:45:38+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] Precedence 0.6

Farrel Lifson ha scritto:
>>wow, this seem cool, thanks for releasing it.
>>Anyway, I wonder why you designed the api this way (I'm dumb that's not
>>your fault):
>>  why add_activity does not allow pre and post conditions to be set ?
>>Also, IMHO an alias #<< for #add_activity would be nice
>>
> 
> 
> I actually never thought about it but some post facto justification is
> that from the network level I  guess it might be better seperating
> adding activities to the network and connecting them. What I probably
> will do in the next version is have add_activity return the added
> activity so that you could then say
>  net.add_activity(someActivity).add_post_activities(someOtherActivity)

then I'd probably ask about adding  #<< to Activity so that you could write:
net << act1 << act2 << act3
but maybe I just need more sleep :)
Thanks for the answer.