From: gwtmp01@...
Date: 2005-05-12T05:22:09+09:00
Subject: Re: alternatives to ? : contruct

On May 11, 2005, at 4:07 PM, Jason Foreman wrote:
>
> I'd prefer it with less ;'s as well:
>
> a = if (y==z): b else c end

Is this really better than:

     a = (y==z) ? b : c

?

The tertiary operator ?: can be used if you want
something terse and "if then else end" if you want something
more verbose.  I'm not sure I see the need for yet another
variation.


Gary Wright