From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2005-05-11T06:03:52+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] Redesign 2005, Round Two

--927295978-726135792-1115759009=:31590
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="927295978-726135792-1115759009=:31590"

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--927295978-726135792-1115759009=:31590
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE

Hi --

On Wed, 11 May 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Florian Gro=DF wrote:

> gabriele renzi wrote:
>
>> Now that there is (mostly) agreement on a ruby icon, I think it would be=
=20
>> great to come up with some nice images to put on our own websites/blog.
>> I'm not just thinking of "ruby powered" images but also something like=
=20
>> "Ruby Developer", "I Love Ruby", "Ruby Contributor" and such on the line=
s=20
>> of the mono gif[1]. What do people think of this?
>
> This one has graphical problems and I know of them, but perhaps somebody =
from=20
> the VI-Team would be able to take the idea and rework it consistently int=
o=20
> the style of the current gem graphic. I'm not sure what the exacts=20
> requirements for being considered a "Ruby Hacker" would be (do we need th=
em=20
> at all?) but chris2 seems to have suggested that being in the change log =
or=20
> not might be one.

There's no requirement for being considered a Ruby hacker other than
that you be a Ruby hacker and want to call yourself that.  (I usually
go with "Rubyist".)  Or that you are not one but want people to think
you are :-)


David

--=20
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net
--927295978-726135792-1115759009=:31590--
--927295978-726135792-1115759009=:31590--