From: ES <ruby-ml@...>
Date: 2005-05-10T02:24:22+09:00
Subject: Re: [ETYMOLOGY] - Sterile Classes / Sterile Meta Classes


Le 9/5/2005, "Christian Neukirchen" <chneukirchen@gmail.com> a �crit:
>ES <ruby-ml@magical-cat.org> writes:
>
>> Gavin Kistner wrote:
>> I tossed in one additional suggestion, #mu.
>>
>> People who learn ruby will need to learn the concept of these classes
>> anyway and there is really no sense in trying to cram all of that info
>> into *one word* in a vain attempt to make it immediately understandable
>> to people with no background. So just teach them a new word; that will
>> make it easier to discuss within the group and will reduce confusion
>> outside of it. My primary votes will go to the 'nonsense' words.
>>
>> That, and I like the connotations of 'mu' plus it is fun to say!
>>
>> mu mu muuuuu mu muuu mu
>
>Does a cow have buddha nature?

The more important question: does Buddha have a cow nature?

>> E
>Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org

E

--
template<typename duck>
void quack(duck& d) { d.quack(); }