From: Michel Martens Date: 2005-05-09T05:53:04+09:00 Subject: Re: Singleton class terminology On 5/8/05, Hal Fulton wrote: > But in that sense, a "singleton class" is not a class at all. > It is just a "place" where we store information on unique methods > and attributes and such. You're right. I think the terminology for what we now call "singleton class" should elide both terms and better reflect the fact that it's a place with the characteristics you have just described. Michel.