From: Paul Hanchett <paulha@...>
Date: 2005-05-08T03:09:25+09:00
Subject: Re: [OG] [NITRO] - Mr. Moschovitis Revolutionary Redefinition of an Open  Source Project

Is there a way of moderating Mr. Lazardis' comments to the group so that 
we don't have to wade through piffle?

Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> George Moschovitis wrote
> [
> within thread:
> Re: [Nitro] [OG] - 0.16.0 with automated table evolution
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.nitro.general/305
> ]
> 
>> Thanks.
>> BTW, there is a code repository for Nitro/Og that includes the latest
>> version. 
> 
> 
> ok
> 
>> This repository is open to a group of 5 developers that have
>> given me valuable suggestions, bug reports through private emails. 
> 
> 
> Open to 5 (five!!!) developers [= feedback contributors]
> 
> => Bug Reporst via emails.
> 
>> So there *are* people reviewing the new Og code. 
> 
> 
> 5 - very impressive.
> 
>> Moreover, I consider all
>> the suggestions posted to this list. If anyone on this list *really*
>> wants to see the latest code just send me an email and I can arrange
>> this.
> 
> 
> I've seldom seen such an amateur insisting on his own inability.
> 
> Do you really think that I would _ask_ you for access to an 
> open-source-project repository?
> 
> How ridiculous.
> 
>> But I would advice to be patient, a new version will be released real
>> soon now (sic). It will not contain all the planned features but will
>> allow for broader review of the new code by all interested parties.
> 
> 
> I would advice you to become serious and professional - and to cover at 
> least general requirements for an open-source project.
> 
> I would additionally advice you, to remove immediately the moderation 
> from my account on the "nitro.general" list.
> 
> -
> -
> -
> 
> Status Quo:
> 
> Open Source Product, minimum Requirement: Open Source
> 
> Open Source Project, minimum Requirement: Open Source Repository
> 
> http://lazaridis.com/core/project/open.html
> 
> .
>