From: Markus Date: 2005-05-07T06:21:48+09:00 Subject: Re: .. and ... aren't operators, maybe they should be? On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 13:51, Logan Capaldo wrote: > On 5/5/05, Logan Capaldo wrote: > > I was just wondering if maybe the range construction syntax could be > > implemented as a set of operators? > > > Nobody likes this idea? Or is it just so dumb its not worthy of a response? ;) I think the problem is that it was talked to death about six or eight months ago, in one of the longest counter-examples to Goodwin's law I've ever seen. If the topic interests you, check the archives for a bunch of different insights into people's thinking. --MarkusQ