From: Ryan Leavengood <mrcode@...>
Date: 2005-05-07T01:22:58+09:00
Subject: Re: unit test

Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
>
> I'd favor the last option, since Ruby's dynamic
> nature makes a method count extremely brittle. Perhaps you could
> explicitly check for methods you expect to be there, or better yet,
> whether the object you're testing #responds_to? the methods of interest?

I agree with this.

Brian: why is it important that you test the number of methods?

Ryan