From: JZ <spamerom@...>
Date: 2005-03-31T05:14:45+09:00
Subject: Re: Poor efficency of Ruby...

Dnia Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:24:30 +0900, Austin Ziegler napisa�(a):

> There is no problem with Ruby and CGI (or much of anything else).
> Ruwiki is a decently fast wiki application written in Ruby. There is
> a problem with Rails and CGI, because the basic philosophy of Rails
> is different.
> 
> Rails is best considered an application server, and as such is
> expected to be running on your system full time (as far as I can
> tell, it doesn't). Otherwise, you have to go through its extensive
> compile process every time -- no, Ruby doesn't do bytecodes or
> bytecode caching at this point.

I sth do not understand. Did I really execute Rails through CGI??? I
thought I executed long-running process of Rails through "ruby.exe
scripts\server" command. And CGI, as I thought, was only small adapter
between Apache and Rails application server. 
E.g. Webware can work in that way. CGI is used only as a bridge between
Apache and long-running Webkit applications server. It works very fast.

--
JZ