From: Hal Fulton Date: 2005-03-28T13:23:39+09:00 Subject: Re: ! haphazard bertrandmuscle@yahoo.com wrote: > Thank you for the information. > > It doesn't seem that you can chain them either, which is too bad. > > I'm just surprised by this-- that's a pretty glaring inconsistency. It > should be in everything or nothing. "Everything or nothing" is a good first-order rule. But as you start to examine things more deeply, sometimes you find reasons that some should be left out. I'm sorry I don't have an example -- I agree it's unconvincing for me to make such an assertion without backing it up. Hal