From: Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...>
Date: 2005-03-24T05:57:23+09:00
Subject: Re: RCR 296: Destructive methods return self

From what I can tell, the basis for your alternative syntax (**) was
that (*) was not consistent. Florian has already pointed out that it
is, in fact, consistent (the astericks functions as an array
'collector' already), so I think we're back to the single * syntax,
right?

Dan