From: Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...>
Date: 2005-03-24T05:52:06+09:00
Subject: Re: RCR 296: Destructive methods return self

No need to apologize, I was just too blind to see it :)


On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:19:49 +0900, Florian Gross <flgr@ccan.de> wrote:
> Daniel Amelang wrote:
> 
> >>And you'll have to agree that that won't work.
> >
> > Yes, with the current state of Ruby, you are right. But let's travel
> > back and take another look at matz's original idea: introducing _true_
> > multiple return values.
> 
> Yup, I tried to hint at that solution as an alternative in the email.
> Sorry if I was not being explicit enough.
> 
>