From: Florian Gross <flgr@...>
Date: 2005-03-23T12:19:49+09:00
Subject: Re: RCR 296: Destructive methods return self

Daniel Amelang wrote:

>>And you'll have to agree that that won't work.
> 
> Yes, with the current state of Ruby, you are right. But let's travel
> back and take another look at matz's original idea: introducing _true_
> multiple return values. 

Yup, I tried to hint at that solution as an alternative in the email. 
Sorry if I was not being explicit enough.