From: Navindra Umanee Date: 2005-03-21T00:14:09+09:00 Subject: Re: Paul Graham recommends Ruby David A. Black wrote: > I'm not sure about the naturalness of it -- I'm more thinking about > the fact that () isn't a method, whereas x(), where x is an object > reference (rather than a method identifier), looks like you're calling > the method () on x. It isn't a method in 1.9? Well, maybe it will be made a method or at least a synonym/alias for call, although I guess that parsing-wise you might have to find a compromise. x() doesn't really look like a method any more than x[] does... Cheers, Navin.