From: Aredridel Date: 2005-03-20T15:08:10+09:00 Subject: Re: Paul Graham recommends Ruby On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 06:50:04AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > Hi, > > In message "Re: Paul Graham recommends Ruby" > on Sun, 20 Mar 2005 05:42:59 +0900, "David A. Black" writes: > > |Matz: can you clarify where this is going? > > Nowhere. I'm just experimenting new syntax, such as > > * a lambda without "lambda" > * call without "call" > * explicit block local variables > * etc. > > They are fragile by nature. They might be removed in the future. I rather like the idea of a lambda without lambda, and moreso the call without #call. I can see the fragility, but I've wanted it. I'd love it if it's possible without wrecking things.