From: Lothar Scholz Date: 2005-03-19T08:55:57+09:00 Subject: Re: Free Rails hosting? Hello Eric, I think you didn't understand the intention of my posting. EH> 43 Things averages 46661 KB/Rails process (we peak at 200,000 EH> pageviews/day running 40 processes FastCGI across 2 servers). Most of EH> the time load hovers around 0.10 to 0.20 (we have dual 3GHz Xeons with EH> 2GB RAM), but peaks at about 0.50. ..... EH> People have just managed to fit Rails into 64MB virtual servers. I EH> doubt you could do the same with a Java app. This is about factor 50-100 to high to provide a free hosting environment. You can without problems put 1000 PHP Users on one machine. Many free hosters have even more then this. >> It absolutely makes no sense for any hoster to offer something like >> this. EH> I disagree and feel that this is a statement that carries a great deal EH> of ignorance. EH> I believe people have gotten Rails to fit in a 64MB virtual server with EH> a shoehorn. There's been some discussion of this on the Rails mailing EH> list. It would make perfect sense for a host to offer free 64MB EH> virtual servers because the sandbox is much easier to manage. If somebody offers a free hosting the management should be around 0. >> It is also difficult to setup because you need a FCGI. EH> Installing involves about 4 lines added to the httpd.conf and EH> installing 3 packages. FastCGI is common enough that packages EH> (FreeBSD's ports tree, in my case) are very readily available. Thats to much if you don't get money. You also have to setup some scripts on a machine and observe more processes. How does FCGI perform when there are 200 or more different FCGI servers ? If you offer it for free you must put a lot of persons on the machine, because it costs money for the hardware, power, security (data center)... It makes sense to offer rails support without doubt, much more sense then java server page support. But not for free. For free you will only get static webspace or php / simplest cgi support. They are the only way to put the cost low enough to cross finance the service with advertising or by hope that a few users will upgrade to non-free packages. Maybe some education institutions will offer it for free (since they can get the money in other ways) and so this was my recommended advise to the original poster: ask his school/university. I hope you understand that i'm not speaking against rails, but about the financal problems of web hosters. -- Best regards, emailto: scholz at scriptolutions dot com Lothar Scholz http://www.ruby-ide.com CTO Scriptolutions Ruby, PHP, Python IDE 's