From: Richard Lyman Date: 2005-03-16T10:45:40+09:00 Subject: Re: Codefest Grant - RubyGems cleanup and enhancement On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:00:55 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote: > On 15 Mar 2005, at 14:33, Richard Lyman wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 04:48:49 +0900, Ryan Davis > > wrote: > >> > >> We'd like to show up w/ a prioritized list of things we'd like to do > >> and maybe even some already failing unit tests so we can be on task > >> from the very beginning. Instead, we are weeding through a bunch of > >> dogmatic crap that we didn't ask for and are not much closer to having > >> said list. I've flagged a couple of email for ideas, but they are a > >> vast minority thus-far. > >> > >> P.S. That goes for writing a whole GUI frontend as well. We are > >> meeting > >> for ONE WEEKEND. > >> > >> > > > > I'm confused. _What_ goes for writing a whole GUI frontend? > > Not going to happen. > > > You're going to write a frontend for 'gems'? > > No. > > > The _first_ release > > should be entirely possible in one weekend with a couple of good > > developers. > > Exactly. The Codefest Grant is enough for one weekend, so what's the > purpose of spending money on us if what we develop is unlikely to be > maintained or finished? (I'm not terribly interested in maintaining > it, and I'm certainly not interested in GUI toolkit headaches either.) > > I'd much rather see the Codefest Grant money put to a use that will > have the greatest benefit to Ruby, and a GUI only falls under the "ooh! > shiny!" category for me. > > Things like behaving nicely to ^C or a command to remove old gems are > much more beneficial and I think the community will get more value for > their donated dollars. We're looking for the rough edges and dull > surfaces to sand down and polish. (Yeah, I'm going to be spending your > money, so I don't want to be producing stillborn projects.) > > The idea is to pull off a huge success so we (the community) can point > to something and say "look what your donated dollars bought!" This way > more dollars will be donated which allows larger, longer projects to be > funded. > > -- > Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://segment7.net > FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E 7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04 > That makes perfect sense then. Thanks for the explanation and good luck with the enhancements! -Rich